Direct sources
Official sources take priority for technical specifications, standards, and brand policies. Review papers summarize research, with limitations stated in the text.
Cankav editorial and sources policy
This page explains how Cankav’s public guides are written, sourced, reviewed, and corrected, and which claims are not published without evidence.
Last reviewed: 28 Mordad 1405
Distinguish facts and suggestions
Verifiable facts, research interpretations, and practical suggestions should be clearly separated. Promotional wording does not replace evidence.
No fabricated outcomes
Progress statistics, family satisfaction, teacher CVs, certificates, and business partnerships are published only when verifiable evidence and publication permission exist.
Review date
Sensitive guides need a review date. Changes to class methods, technical services, regulations, or scientific evidence may require an earlier review.
Author and reviewer
A person’s name is shown only with a verified identity and role. Until then, organizational content is published under Cankav editorial team and must not be attributed to an invented person.
Corrections and contact
If you find a content error, outdated source, or unclear claim, send the page address and relevant section for review.
View the journey